A fundamental to good teaching
and learning are questioning. When teachers have effective questioning methods,
as a significance feature of their lessons, students will most likely to:
1.
Develop a much fuller understanding because they would try
explaining it by themselves
2.
Could easily recall their existing knowledge
3.
They are clear on the main point of the lesson
4.
Able to handle tasks or problems at a higher level, therefore
expanding their ability to think
5.
Able to link their prior knowledge with the ideas in the
lessons
6.
Clear about the task and knows what to expect; easily
connects with the task
7.
Be able to develop independence thinking and learning
Common issues
Students understanding of
a topic or idea is usually not fully developed as the teachers would expect
them to be. Students from disadvantaged backgrounds may respond with negativity
to some form of questionings due to lack of self – esteem and their desire to
appear respected in front of their friends. Therefore by modifying on how
questions are asked will improve their interest in learning.
Handling the issues
Effective questioning is a
skill that can be learned. All teachers’ questions their students, but in order
to do it well, it requires an understanding and planning on how to make a
student engage with the lesson and thus pushing them to think.
How can we be an effective questioner?
- Knows how to promote
responses and having students to response on questions that are given
- Knows how to plan
questions for and during learning
- Knows how the
technics used for questioning could improve students cognitive abilities
- Knows how to avoid
pitfalls and knows how to plan alternative questioning technics
- Learn classroom
tactics on how to be an effective questioner
- Able to respond to
students answers, that will encouraged them to participate more
The most important feature
in the classroom are the interactions between the students and their teachers.
It doesn’t matter if teachers are to help learners to learn basic skills or
better understanding in solving problems, or to be engage in high level
thinking, questions are vital. Questions doesn’t have to be only the teachers
asking them to students it could be done the opposite way. Both is important in
teaching and learning. Questioning is a principal skill that anyone can learn
and use it. Therefore, ways to help students to develop their own ability and
knowledge on how to raise and formulate questions could be learned. Raising
questions and knowing the right questions to ask is one of the important skills
that pupils need to learn.
Research into questioning
has given us some clear points on how it works. These provides the basis to
improving classroom practice. The common issue identified is that students are
not given enough time for them to think of an answer, the other issue is, some teachers
has the tendency to ask too many questions of the same type.
What is the purpose of
questioning?
Teachers ask questions for several reasons.
- To get students attention and
interests
- To challenge students thinking
- To check on their understanding and
prior knowledge
- Stimulating their prior knowledge in
order to create new meaning and understanding
- To have students focusing on key
concepts and issues
- To extend students way of thinking
from concrete and factual to evaluative and analytical
- To lead students with planned
sequences which in turn establishes key understanding
- To nurture their way of reasoning,
evaluation and problem solving
- To promote students way of thinking on
what they have learned.
Open and closed questions
asked will depend on the reason for asking it. If teachers wants to check on
their students understandings, they can use close questions. Close questions
have only one clear answer. Example questions like, “What is the name of the
main character in this story?”.
But, if we want to help
our students develop a higher level of thinking skills, we should ask open
ended questions. This allows the students to give variety of responses that are
acceptable. Open ended questions are useful to ask during debriefings and
discussions. Example questions like, “Based on the story, what moral values
that we can learn from it?”. Questionings tactics is sometimes used to bring
the students attention back to the lesson. For example, “Do you agree with this
Gary?”.
Questioning pitfalls and solution
Even
though the common form of interaction between a teacher and her students are
questioning, but, sometimes, those questions are not always well said or
productive for students learning.
Not clear on why the question was
asked: teachers need to refer back to what kind of lesson
that they are planning. Does it focuses mostly on the facts, or rules? Or
sequences of actions? If that is the lesson plan, close ended question is much
more suitable. It relates directly to the knowledge. But if the lesson plans
are made to focus more on concepts or comprehensions, open ended questions
would be more appropriate. Because it will relate students on how to analyse
and evaluate.
Too many questions are asked at one
time: asking about an issue that is complex will result to
complex questions. And because these questions are done orally, students will
find it difficult to understand what is needed and easily become confused. When
dealing with complex issues, teachers need to tease out the issues first and to
focus on one idea only. This helps student’s use concrete, direct language.
Asking difficult questions without
constructing the students: when there is no planning of
questions with increasing difficulty the above happens. Sequencing questions
helps students to climb to a higher level of thinking.
Not serious in treating students
answers: sometimes teachers ignores answers that is a little
off topic. By doing so, they fail to see the effects of these answers and would
certainly missed out the opportunity to construct on them. Teachers should ask
the pupils why they gave that answer in the first place, also ask them if there
is anything that they would like to add to that answer. Ask other students to
help extend the answer, but it is important not to cut them off and moving on
too quickly if the answer is wrong.
Dealing inefficiently with
misconceptions and wrong answers: teachers’ sometime has the
idea that they might risk damaging their students self – esteem if they correct
them. But, there are ways of handling this, the positive way. Teachers could
use scaffoldings or providing prompts to help their students correct their
mistakes.
Some
other practical tips for teachers when practicing questioning sessions are,
teachers should be clear when asking questions. We need to make sure that the
students do what we want them to do. Next is, to plan sequence of question to
challenge students cognitively. Always give time for the students to answer and
when necessary, provide prompts.
How to make effective questioning
Effectiveness
is central to how questions are asked. All students will respond well to
teachers that shows interest in their ideas and opinions. The way teachers
asking the questions or listening to how students’ response is important. Good
teachers always shows genuine curiosity when asking questions, this is to
invite their students to think together with the teacher. For example, “How do
we know that this is the correct way?”. And the way teachers respond to
students’ answers are also important.
Creating an environment where
students feels that there is no harm in making mistakes: This
is vital. If students to build their
own confidence and taking risks. To avoid students feel vulnerable, teachers
may ask the students to write the answers at the same time and then hold them
up so the teachers could see. And it is also vital that whatever students
contributes are to be taken seriously by both teachers and the whole class. Contributions
from students are listened to and taken seriously by both the teacher and the
class. Ensure that the other students give proper responses and not be
critical. Teachers could also model making mistakes, just to show their
students that it is alright to make mistakes.
Probing:
when a student’s responds to questions, probing’s are useful and can be used to
dig into more informations, to clarify on their responses and to get the
students to extend their answers.
Providing students the sufficient
waiting time: if a teacher could spend around 3 seconds to wait for
the students respond and before giving out the next questions, there are
several benefits for that. Teachers could encourage students to give variety of
responses and also building confident in them to take the ‘risks’.
Why is repertoire of questioning
strategies important?
When students gives active
responses to the learning, then the questioning is effective. As suggested by
Borich 1996; Muijs and Reynolds 2001; Morgan and Saxton 1994; Wragg and Brown
2001, effective questioning has the following characteristics:
- Objectives of the
lessons are linked closely with the questions prepared.
- Close end questions
used to check understanding of the students
- Open end questions
dominates.
- Learning of basic
skills are increased by having questions that exposes new content.
- Sequences of
questions are planned for the cognitive level to increase as the
questioning goes on. Ensuring the students are to answer questions that
needed higher thinking skills.
- Students have their
own opportunity to ask and answer questions amongst them.
Their
research tells us the importance of using open, higher level questions in order
to develop students thinking skills. There must be a balance between open end
and close end questions, but, depending on the topic or objectives of the
lesson.
If
students did not respond to the teachers, then there is no point whether you
have structured and planned a good set of questionnaires. This is the drawback
with students that are shy, students that are not interested in learning or
older students that are not used to interactive learning.
Rowe
1986; Black and Harrison 2001; Black et al. 2002 had identified some strategies
to attract students attention and to get them to respond. To provide an
environment where students feels safe in making mistakes and not be judged or
ridicule. Good prompts given by the teachers to build confidence for the
students to at least try to answer. A ‘no – hands’ approach on answering
questions, where teachers chooses the respondent. And lastly, wait time of 3
seconds. Rowe 1986; Borich 1996, their
research shows that the average wait time is 1 second.
“Lower-level questions usually
demand factual, descriptive answers that are relatively easy to give.
Higher-level questions require more sophisticated thinking from pupils; they
are more complex and more difficult to answer. Higher-level questions are central
to pupils’ cognitive development, and research evidence suggests that pupils’
levels of achievement can be increased by regular access to higher-order thinking”
The
above are research done by Borich 1996; Muijs and Reynolds 2001; Morgan and
Saxton 1994; Wragg and Brown 2001; Black and Harrison 2001.
It
is useful to use Blooms Taxonomy (Bloom and Krathwohl 1956) when creating and
structuring high level questions. It classifies on levels of intellectual
behaviour that is important during learning into six levels of complexity and
abstraction. Those are:
- Knowledge – to describe, recall
- Comprehension – to translate, review, report
- Application – to interpret, predict
- Analysis – to explain, analyse, criticise
- Synthesis – to design, create, construct
- Evaluation – assess, compare, argue, select.
From
the scale of order, knowledge is the lowest and evaluation is the highest.
Therefore
it can be concluded that, researches has suggested that good teachers uses a
great number of open questions. With, of course, mix of both open and close end
questions depending on the lessons objectives. Teachers that doesn’t provide
open end questions may provide inadequate cognitive challenges for their
students. Because of its main importance in teaching and learning, questioning
is by far the most researched area and the most successful.
Referring
to Blooms Taxonomy, the questions that are prepared according to the text ‘The
Arrogant Swans’ are as follows.
- Knowledge – for students to retain information for specific task or
other related informations
§
What is the story about?
§
Who paid golden feathers to the
King?
- Comprehension – for students to process the knowledge that they
already had to answer the questions
§
What do you think happens to the
swans when the bird went to see the King?
§
What did the bird plead to the
swans?
- Application – students to apply their existing knowledge to apply to
a new context.
§
What do you think happen to the
swans after the King gave his orders?
- Inference – to link students to a more abstract, conceptual thoughts
§
What moral qualities does the story
teaches you?
§
Why do you think the swans doesn’t
allow the bird to stay in the river?
- Synthesis – for students to collect from available knowledge and
respond to new knowledge
§
What would you do if you were in
the bird’s situation?
- Evaluation – students to use their knowledge to form their own
judgement and to stand by them
§
Is the King’s action towards the
swans appropriate? What do you think?
§
What conclusion could you draw from
this story?
Summary
Why
repertoire questioning? Repertoire questionings will assist students to expand
the way they think that are usually based on contractual and factual thinking,
to ways of thinking analytically and to evaluate. Repertoire questionings also
helps to establish key understanding, students must be lead through a planned
sequences of questioning. This method also allows students to problem solving,
formulation of hypotheses and also to promote reasoning and the way they have
learned. Researchers has proven that questioning technics helps develop
critical thinking and cognitive ability for the students. The way teachers
imply them is important. Teachers must learn on how to attract students in the
lesson and in way of questioning. It is crucial for the students to feel that
the questions put to them are not as if they are being interrogated. As said
before, questioning is something that both teachers an students can both learn
and benefit from it.
“we learn 10% of what we read, 20% of what we
hear, 30% of what we see, 50% of what we hear and see, 70% of what we discuss
with others, 80% of what we experience ourselves and 95% of what we teach”
(William Glasser)
REFERENCES
v Morgan,
N. and Saxton, J. (1994) Asking better questions: models, techniques and
classroom activities for engaging students in learning. Pembroke. ISBN:
1551380455.
v Rowe,
M. B. (1986) ‘Wait time: slowing down may be a way of speeding up!’. Journal of
Teacher Education 37 (January–February) 43–50.
v Black,
P. and Harrison, C. (2001) ‘Feedback in questioning and marking: the science
teacher’s role in formative assessment’. School Science Review 82 (June) 43–49.
v Pedagogy
and Practice: Teaching and Learning in Secondary Schools (2004). Viewed at http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5671/2/cea27fdd968639560cb245efafd9c2ff.pdf.
Accessed on 12th March 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment